My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_DEIR
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
12-10
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBIT A
>
_DEIR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 3:54:34 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
586
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Draft EIR Air Quality <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 3.2-31 <br />https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-02 Air Quality.docx <br />following screening criteria are met, operation of the proposed project would result in a less than <br />significant impact related to CO: <br />• The project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program established by <br />the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, the regional <br />transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans. <br />• Project-generated traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more <br />than 44,000 vehicles per hour. <br />• Project-generated traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more <br />than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited <br />(e.g., tunnel, parking garage, bridge underpass, natural or urban street canyon, below-grade <br />roadway). <br /> <br />In accordance with SB 743, transportation analysis in accordance with CEQA no longer uses delay- <br />based metrics such as congestion to analyze project impacts. As previously discussed, the proposed <br />project includes annexation into the City of Pleasanton, along with a General Plan Amendment of PH <br />Overlay to LDR, a PUD rezoning. The proposed project site would be rezoned from unincorporated to <br />Planned Unit Development-Low Density Residential (PUD-LDR). The project site was evaluated as <br />PUD-LDR in the City’s 2023–2031 Housing Element Update. Once annexed and rezoned, the <br />proposed project would be consistent with the underlying general plan land use designation and was <br />considered in the City’s most recently adopted Housing Element. The proposed project is consistent <br />with the land use designation defined in the City’s General Plan, which is therefore consistent with <br />the applicable congestion management program, and the proposed project is consistent with the <br />first criterion. <br />The nearest intersection with recorded daily traffic volumes is Interstate 580 (I-580) and Interstate <br />680 (I-680) according to the Caltrans Traffic Census Program 28 which provides traffic volume data for <br />the State highway system. According to the Traffic Census Program, the sections of I-580 near the <br />project site (at I-680) receive a peak-hour traffic volume of 21,100 vehicles. According to the <br />Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition, the proposed <br />project is anticipated to generate 407 daily trips (including the trips associated with the single-family <br />homes, and the new trips associated with the buildout of the trail head connecting the proposed <br />project site to the East Bay Park District). Therefore, even with the addition of daily trips generated <br />by the proposed project, no nearby intersections impacted by the proposed project would <br />experience traffic volumes of 24,000 to 44,000 vehicles per hour. Thus, the proposed project would <br />not result in any nearby intersection having peak-hour traffic volumes exceeding 44,000 vehicles per <br />hour, nor would the proposed project result in increased traffic volumes at affected intersections to <br />more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited. <br />Therefore, based on the above criteria, the proposed project would not exceed the CO screening <br />criteria and would have a less than significant impact related to CO. <br /> <br />28 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Traffic Census Program. Website: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic- <br />operations/census. Accessed June 2, 2024.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.