Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve <br />Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Draft EIR <br /> <br /> <br />3.6-36 FirstCarbon Solutions <br /> https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480016/EIR/3 - Draft EIR/21480016 Sec03-06 Geology.docx <br />Required Investigation, cumulative impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, as described <br />above, the proposed project’s incremental contribution to the less than significant cumulative <br />impact related to seismic-related hazards would be less than cumulatively considerable. <br />Soil-related Hazards <br />The Greek Orthodox Church Project is within the geographic scope for this cumulative analysis and <br />would likely implement construction activities such as grading, trenching, and filling that could <br />exacerbate soil erosion. If the Greek Orthodox Church Project disturbs at least one acre of land, the <br />Greek Orthodox Church Project, similar to the proposed project, would be required to abide by <br />Municipal Code Section 9.14 which conforms to C.6 Construction Site Control Requirements in the <br />RWQCB NPDES permit (Order No. R2-2022-1108; NPDES Permit No. CAS612008) by submitting a NOI <br />to the City, and would prepare an erosion/pollution control plan or SWPPP to obtain a Construction <br />Stormwater General Permit. The erosion/pollution control plan or SWPPP would identify and <br />implement site-suitable BMPs that would implement erosion and sediment control measures during <br />construction activities. As previously mentioned, the Greek Orthodox Church Project is not <br />delineated in a Landslide or Liquefaction Zone of Required Investigation by the CGS. Accordingly, <br />cumulative impacts related to landslides or liquefaction would be less than significant. Furthermore, <br />soil-related hazards such as lateral spreading, collapse, subsidence, and expansive soils are site <br />specific, and both projects are in direct proximity to the City’s existing water lines, sewer lines, and <br />stormwater drains and would not require the installation of septic tanks or other alternative <br />wastewater disposal systems. Since both projects would be required to implement site-specific <br />erosion control measures through BMPs, soil-related hazards are site-specific, and are in proximity to <br />the City’s water lines. Therefore, cumulative impacts would be less than significant. Moreover, as <br />discussed above, the proposed project’s incremental contribution to less than significant cumulative <br />impacts would not be cumulatively considerable. Impacts related to soil hazards would be less than <br />significant, and the proposed project ’s incremental contribution would be less than significant. <br />Paleontological Resources <br />Potential cumulative impacts to paleontological resources are limited to construction. As discussed <br />above, the Greek Orthodox Church Project is the only cumulative project within an 0.5-mile radius <br />from the project site and is considered in the geographic scope for this cumulative analysis. Because <br />of being in relative proximity to each other, both the proposed project and the Greek Orthodox <br />Church Project are likely situated on the same Miocene sedimentary rocks comprised of sandstone, <br />siltstone, and siliceous shale. As previously mentioned, rock units with high paleontological potential <br />consist of sedimentary rock units such as argillaceous and carbonate-rich paleosols and fine-grained <br />marine sandstones. As such, ground-disturbing activities during the construction phase of each <br />project have the potential to unintentionally uncover and disturb significant paleontological <br />resources on-site. Because of the site-specific nature of potential impacts, the potential for <br />cumulative impacts is limited. However, both the proposed project and the Greek Orthodox Church <br />Project would be required to abide by the same applicable federal, State, and local rules and <br />regulations governing the preservation, recovery, and curation of significant paleontological <br />resources and would implement mitigation measures identified as necessary regarding the potential <br />of uncovering such resources. In addition, the discovery of significant paleontological resources is <br />site-specific and any unintentional discovery from construction activities would not directly