Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />City of Pleasanton, CA (0012108.00) 3-5 Woodard & Curran, Inc. <br />Pleasanton Long-Term Sewer CIP October 6, 2025 <br />3.3.3 Sewer Inspection/Condition Assessment <br />As described in Section 2.7, the City will be collecting additional inspection data on gravity sewers, trunk <br />sewers, sewer siphons, and force mains as part of the long-term CIP to determine what, if any, rehabilitation <br />is required for these assets. Due to the criticality and unknown condition of these assets, the inspection and <br />condition assessment work was considered priority A. If one or more of these asset classes are shown to be <br />in poor condition, it may result in significant changes to the mid-term and long-term CIP. A summary of the <br />costs for these inspections and condition assessments are shown in Table 3-3. <br /> <br />TABLE 3-3: PRIORITY A – SEWER INSPECTION/CONDITION ASSESSMENT PROJECTS <br />Project Notes Estimated Total <br />Capital Cost <br />Large Diameter Inspection Study Included in the near- <br />term capital budget $150,000 <br />Sewer Siphon Inspections (8), approx. 2,600 LF total Included in the near- <br />term O&M budget NA <br />Force Main Desktop Analysis and Inspections Included in the near- <br />term capital budget $704,000 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3.3.4 Sewer Capacity Improvements <br />All four capacity projects identified by capacity evaluation (see Section 2.3) were considered priority A <br />projects. Delaying these projects increases the risk of sewer spills, particularly for the projects triggered by <br />existing sewer loads during wet weather conditions. For the projects triggered by future loads, the capacity <br />improvements would ideally be constructed in tandem with the development, increasing the sewer capacity <br />as additional flows are added to the system. Since these projects (Kiewit, Arroyo Lago, and the Stoneridge <br />Mall developments specifically) are assumed to be starting construction in the next 5-years, these projects <br />received a Priority A rating. However, this assumption should be reassessed if these future developments <br />are delayed. Furthermore, funding for capacity improvement projects caused by future developments is <br />assumed to be almost entirely paid for by future development. A summary of the capacity projects and their <br />cost to existing and future customers is shown below in Table 3-4. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 231 of 323