My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
121625 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2025 2:12:17 PM
Creation date
12/26/2025 2:09:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/16/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 9 <br />(AMP) is a multi-year project divided into three phases. Each phase is discussed further in the <br />Discussion section of this report. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />Over 200,000 assets were identified; see Attachment 1 for a summary list of assets. <br /> <br />Based on the information collected, staff can develop a replacement schedule that <br />incorporates asset condition, lifecycle, and estimated in-kind replacement costs. This new <br />system and information will result in a comprehensive and data-driven version of the City’s <br />Repair and Replacement (R&R) program. Because available funding will not meet all long-term <br />needs, the AMP assigns a risk score to each asset, enabling the City to prioritize investment in <br />the most critical infrastructure. The AMP will provide a prioritized list of asset replacement <br />needs by year and can identify what can be achieved within available funding levels. <br /> <br />The AMP also serves as a tool for evaluating when it is more cost-effective to replace a major <br />asset rather than continue repairing individual components. For example, it can help determine <br />whether it is better to replace a vehicle’s engine or replace the entire vehicle, using asset <br />performance history and fleet data to inform the decision. <br /> <br />Staff will be using the data collected through the first two phases of the AMP to develop the <br />City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and a Facility Master Plan. The CIP is driven by <br />business decisions to improve functionality, increase capacity, or add enhancements—items <br />that go beyond basic like-for-like replacement. These types of decisions are typically made <br />through master planning and engineering analyses to develop the 20-Year CIP plans. The <br />AMP provides the foundational asset and lifecycle data needed to inform that work. Staff will <br />provide a recommendation to the City Council on the 20-Year CIP plan in late Spring/Summer <br />2026, and a comprehensive Facility Master Plan by the end of 2026. The sewer and water <br />management plans have already been completed. <br /> <br />Phase 1 Summary <br />A successful Asset Management program begins with defining what constitutes an asset. At a <br />basic level, an asset is something that lasts more than one year and requires investment, <br />maintenance, and eventual replacement. In a business context, capital assets are typically <br />valued at more than $5,000, generate a return on investment, and are subject to depreciation. <br />In the public sector, however, assets are often used to support community services rather than <br />generating profit. As a result, the factors that determine whether an item should be managed <br />as an asset include access to services, service quality, risk, and community expectations. <br /> <br />Many City assets carry higher service and risk implications, requiring redundancy, rapid repair <br />capabilities, stockpiled replacement parts, or shorter replacement cycles. While assets may <br />appear similar in type, their service importance and operational risk can vary significantly. <br />Phase 1 of the AMP, therefore, included a review of asset types to balance risk, level of <br />service, cost of service, and resident expectations, defining the level of assets to capture. <br /> <br />The primary objectives of Phase 1 were to: <br /> <br />(1) identify the full inventory of assets the City owns and manages, and <br />(2) determine the desired level of service and perform life cycle cost analysis for each group to <br />understand future asset replacement needs. <br />Page 334 of 373
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.