Laserfiche WebLink
EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES WITHIN BERNAL SUBBASIN <br />APRIL 2026 / FINAL / CAROLLO <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON 17 <br />5.1.5 Implementation Schedule <br />This criterion considers the following: <br /> The anticipated time from project approval to water production. This includes pre-design, design, <br />construction and corresponding permitting where applicable to each alternative. <br /> Potential for delays in implementation schedule and impacts to City. <br /> Alternatives with a shorter implementation schedule are considered more favorable. <br />The weight of this criterion is 3 (15 percent). <br />5.2 Alternatives Evaluation <br />5.2.1 Alternatives Evaluation Methodology <br />Carollo and the City met on February 11, 2026, to discuss the evaluation methodology to compare project <br />alternatives. Figure 10 illustrates the evaluation methodology. <br /> <br />Figure 10 Alternatives Screening Methodology <br />The next step is to evaluate each alternative based on the criteria defined in Section 5.1. Table 7 defines a <br />score of 1, 3, or 5 for each criteria. It should be noted that the higher scores are better than lower scores <br />(a score of 5 is better than a 1). In addition, scores of 2 and 4 may be assigned if an alternative falls <br />between the definition of 1, 3, or 5 for a given evaluation criterion.