My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 04222026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
04-22
>
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 04222026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2026 11:22:28 AM
Creation date
7/8/2026 11:15:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
DOCUMENT DATE
4/22/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
593
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P18-0078, P18-0080, P18-0081, PUD-130 and Tract 8569 (Hidden Canyon) Planning Commission <br />21 of 28 <br />ANALYSIS <br />Annexation <br />The project site is located outside of the Pleasanton city limits, but within the City’s Sphere of <br />Influence (SOI) and UGB. As such, annexation of the project site, along with the adjacent Oak <br />Hills property located at 10971 Dublin Canyon Road, is required prior to development. The <br />annexation is consistent with applicable Alameda County LAFCo policies, which promote <br />orderly and logical boundary adjustments. <br />Annexation of these properties would represent a logical extension of the City’s boundaries <br />and ensure that development occurs in a comprehensive manner consistent with the City’s <br />General Plan and PMC. The project site is identified in the City’s Housing Element, and <br />annexation would facilitate implementation of Housing Element programs that encourage <br />annexation of contiguous unincorporated lands for residential development. Additionally, <br />annexation would allow the City to apply its development standards, infrastructure <br />requirements, and environmental review processes to the project, while LAFCo would retain <br />authority to review and approve the boundary change to ensure consistency with regional <br />policies. <br />General Plan Land Use and Policy Conformance <br />The project site has General Plan Land Use Designations of Low Density Residential (LDR), <br />Open Space –Public Health and Safety, Open Space –Agriculture and Grazing, and Housing <br />Element Sites Overlay which permits residential uses and open space. While portions of the <br />proposed development are located within areas currently designated Open Space –Public <br />Health and Safety, the project includes a corresponding redesignation of other portions of the <br />site from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Open Space, resulting in a reallocation rather than <br />an increase in the amount of land allocated to residential development across the project site. <br />The Pleasanton General Plan supports such amendments where they further land use and <br />environmental objectives, particularly in hillside areas. Specifically, the General Plan <br />emphasizes preservation of scenic ridgelines, protection of natural landforms, and the use of <br />site planning techniques that concentrate development in less constrained areas while <br />maintaining larger, contiguous open space areas. Consistent with these policies, the proposed <br />General Plan amendment would cluster residential development within the more suitable, <br />lower-gradient portions of the site while redesignating steeper slopes and visually prominent <br />areas to Open Space. This approach aligns with General Plan direction to preserve hillside <br />character, avoid excessive grading, and maintain open space resources, while also allowing <br />flexibility in the precise location of land use boundaries so long as the overall intent of the Land <br />Use Element is achieved. <br />Accordingly, the proposed amendments of LDR and Open Space redesignations maintains the <br />overall land use framework envisioned by the General Plan, ensures consistency with hillside <br />development and resource protection policies, and does not result in a substantive loss of <br />open space, but rather a more appropriate and policy-consistent configuration of uses across <br />the project site. <br />The City’s adopted 2023 Housing Element identifies the proposed project site as Area 1- <br />Lester, which allows up to two residential units per acre with a total maximum number of 31
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.