My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05272026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
05-27
>
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packet 05272026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2026 12:07:40 PM
Creation date
7/8/2026 12:03:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
DOCUMENT DATE
5/27/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The proposed residential development includes three studio units (Units A, B, and C), each <br />measuring approximately 430 square feet, and one larger unit (Unit D) measuring <br />approximately 13,626 square feet, consisting of occupancy across all three floors. Al though the <br />project includes a two-car garage, the applicant is invoking AB 2097, which prohibits public <br />agencies from imposing minimum parking requirements for most development projects within <br />0.5 miles of a major transit stop (discussed further in this report). <br /> <br />Additionally, the project includes approximately 6,192 square feet of pervious landscaping <br />area, including a new parkway strip with two new trees along the south sidewalk of Old Bernal <br />Avenue. The project’s arborist report identified 34 protected trees on site, of which 12 are <br />recommended for removal due to design impacts (Exhibit D). <br /> <br />Building Design <br />The applicant is proposing traditional architecture with modern elements. This “modern <br />farmhouse” style is characterized by wood siding and gable roof forms. Additionally, the design <br />incorporates vertical board-and-batten wood siding, brick veneer tiles, and a black standing- <br />seam metal roof. Detail/trim elements include black door and window trims and black-painted <br />guardrails for the rear second-story balcony. The building’s west elevation rises to three <br />stories, with the third story slightly setback from the first and second floors; no additional <br />articulation is provided between the lower floors, such as belly bands or step backs. <br />The building also includes an attached two-car garage, an approximately 681 square-foot <br />upper rear-facing balcony, and an approximately 230-square-foot terrace on the second floor. <br />Please refer to Exhibit B for full project plans and design details. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS <br />General Plan <br />With respect to the PUD finding concerning whether the proposed development plan is <br />consistent with the General Plan, the subject lot has a General Plan Land Use designation of <br />Mixed-Use. Per Table 2-3 of the General Plan Land Use Element, the allowable density for <br />Mixed-Use Residential is 20+ du/acre. The General Plan notes that the maximum floor area <br />ratio (FAR), as specified in the Downtown Specific Plan, is 125 percent. <br /> <br />As proposed, the project’s density is 8 du/acre with a conforming FAR of 0.71. To strictly <br />conform to the 20+ du/acre density, the project would need to propose a minimum of 10 units. <br />Accordingly, the project’s density is inconsistent with the General Plan. In the past, the City <br />has allowed projects at densities below 20 units per acre, in conjunction with a PUD. However, <br />per the August 2025 Planning Commission workshop, the size and location of the site, as well <br />as policies encouraging multi-unit development on downtown sites, suggest that more than <br />four units and more comparable square footage between all of the units is preferable. <br /> <br />The following General Plan Land Use Element and Housing Element policies and programs <br />are relevant to the proposed redevelopment of the site. The project, as proposed, is not <br />consistent with the following General Plan policies and programs: <br /> <br />Land Use Element <br />Sustainability <br />Program 2.4: Require higher residential and commercial densities in the proximity of <br />transportation corridors and hubs, where feasible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.