PC-2026-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2026-16 Page 8 of 10 G. Whether the plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District: The proposed PUD Development Plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District by allowing flexibility in site design to achieve a development that is responsive to the site’s environmental constraints while meeting City goals and policies. The Project provides public benefits, such as a private park with a public access easement, and provides housing at a density consistent with the applicable land use designations of the East Pleasanton area. Through the PUD process, the Project has been designed to balance development with environmental preservation, infrastructure improvements, and community benefits. This approach reflects the intent of the PUD ordinance to encourage innovative and sensitive site planning. Therefore, the Project conforms to the purposes of the PUD District, and this finding can be made. Section 4: Findings for Approval of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8423. With respect to Tract 8423, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council make the following findings and determinations with respect to Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 19.20.110(A): A. The tentative subdivision map is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan. The proposed vesting tentative map for Tract 8423 is consistent with the General Plan insomuch as it implements the following General Plan goals, programs, and/or policies: 1. Sustainability Program 2.6 (“Require design features in new development and redevelopment areas to encourage transit, bicycle, and pedestrian access, such as connections between activity centers and residential areas, and road design that accommodates transit vehicles, where feasible”) in that it will include a Class 1 trail extension between the Project site and Mohr Avenue to facilitate transit, bicycle, and pedestrian access. 2. Land Use Policy 25 (“Annex urbanized pockets of unincorporated land adjacent to the city limits in areas where landowners are willing to accept City services and development standards”) as it will annex a portion of unincorporated land immediately adjacent to city limits where the applicant is willing to accept City services and comply with City development standards, as reflected in the requested PUD for the Project. 3. Land Use Policy 23 (“Maintain a permanent Urban Growth Boundary [UGB] beyond which urban development shall not be permitted”) as the Project site is within the City’s UGB. B. The findings for denial of a tentative map set forth in Government Code § 66474 cannot be made with respect to the proposed tentative map. The proposed tentative map for Tract 8423 is not inconsistent with the General Plan, as set forth in finding 4(A) above, and no Specific Plan applies to it. Moreover, the design