PC-2026-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

ARROYO LAGO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ADDENDUM FCS 129 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480036/Addendum/21480036 Arroyo Lago Residential Project Addendum.docx impacts or create substantially more severe significant impacts than those previously identified in the Prior FEIR. No additional analysis is required. e) Airports Would the project: For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? Prior FEIR Conclusions The Prior FEIR found that the Livermore Municipal Airport is located approximately 1.6 miles northeast of the project site. The project site is within the Airport Influence Area, however the project site is not within any established noise contours or airport safety zones as indicated by the Livermore Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). As such, the County Project would not result in airport-related safety hazards or excessive noise, and the Prior FEIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.8-23, 6-16). Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion Similar to the conclusions of the Prior FEIR, the project site is not located within any established noise contours or airport safety zones. Accordingly, the proposed project would not result in airport- related hazards, and impacts would be less than significant, consistent with the impact conclusions of the Prior FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not introduce new significant impacts or create substantially more severe significant impacts than those previously identified in the Prior FEIR. No additional analysis is required. f) Emergency Response and Evacuation Would the project: Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Prior FEIR Conclusions The County has developed an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) that establishes policies and procedures and assigns responsibilities to ensure the effective management of emergency operations within the County. The County’s EOP does not list any specific evacuation routes throughout the County because these routes would be determined based on the location and nature of the emergency by the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office. Major roadway networks, including SR-84, I-580, and I-680, provide regional access to the project site and would likely be used as evacuation routes in the event of an emergency. Any road blockages during the construction phase would not interfere with these routes and would be temporary. Therefore, the Prior FEIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.8-23, 6-16).