My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET (2)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
111924 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2026 12:24:12 PM
Creation date
8/17/2026 12:24:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/19/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 5 <br />rehabilitation or replacement. <br />• Priority Level B- Projects that provide measurable progress toward achieving the <br />City’s goals, but the City has a moderate level of control as to when these projects <br />should be accomplished. <br />o These projects include decommissioning Wells #5-8, lower priority fire water flow <br />improvements, additional booster station rehabilitation projects, and customer <br />meter replacements. <br />• Priority Level C- Projects anticipated to be needed but may still need to define scopes <br />and schedules or meet the criteria for Priority Levels A and B. <br />o These projects include future water supply treatment projects (i.e., disinfection), <br />lower priority pipeline replacements, tank mixers, and other facility rehabilitation <br />projects. <br /> <br />Class 5 planning level cost estimates per the Association for the Advancement of Cost <br />Engineering (AACE) were prepared for each project. Class 5 estimates may represent an <br />overestimate of cost by 100 percent or an underestimate of cost by 50 percent. The project <br />cost estimates include administration, design, construction, and a contingency of 30 percent. <br />All costs are tied to a May 2024 ENR Index for San Francisco. <br /> <br />The table below provides a cost summary of the recommended CIP based on project category <br />and prioritization. The recommended long-term CIP has been developed to be implemented <br />over a 20-year timeframe. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Notably, implementation of the WSMP will require additional City engineering staff to manage <br />projects. The number and timing of staff increases will ultimately depend on the project <br />phasing strategy implemented by the City, but over a 20-year period is estimated to be within <br />the range of $8 million-$12 million. Note that one engineering staff position was already <br />approved in FY24/25 and is not included in this cost range. <br /> <br />Implementation of the WSMP will also result in O&M support requirements with the new <br />infrastructure installed. Additionally, existing infrastructure will continue to age and require <br />additional O&M until Repair & Replacement projects are completed. O&M needs will also <br />depend on the project phasing strategy implemented by the City, but over a 20-year period is <br />estimated to be within the range of $12 million-$18 million. When including combined <br />engineering and O&M cost increases, the implementation of WSMP is estimated to have a <br />funding need of $283 million-$289 million over 20 years. <br /> <br />O&M Program Improvements <br />The WSMP also identifies a list of recommended O&M program improvements to comply with <br />future regulations and be consistent with industry best practices. The recommendations are <br />Page 423 of 658
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.