My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
09-09
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2026 12:59:11 PM
Creation date
9/10/2026 12:50:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Additional Housing Sites Rezonings Project <br />Addendum CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 Addendum <br /> <br /> <br />64 <br />e) Lead Agency Determined Tribal Cultural Resources <br />Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal <br />Cultural Resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 <br />as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is <br />geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the <br />landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a <br />California Native American Tribe, and that is a resource <br />determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by <br />substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth <br />in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? <br />Summary of Prior FEIR <br />The current CEQA Guidelines Appendix G defines a TCR as a site, feature, <br />place, cultural landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a <br />California Native American Tribe that is either listed in, eligible for listing in, or <br />determined significant under the California Register or local criteria. <br />The Prior FEIR predates the formal inclusion of TCRs in CEQA Guidelines <br />Appendix G; therefore, it did not include a stand-alone TCRs checklist <br />section. Instead, the Prior FEIR addressed TCRs within the broader discussion <br />of prehistoric and Native American cultural resources. The Prior FEIR found <br />that the Planning Area contains prehistoric resources associated with Native <br />American use, including villages, campsites, burial areas, and ethnographic <br />resources, many of which may remain undiscovered in subsurface contexts. <br />These resources would meet the modern definition of TCRs, where they hold <br />cultural value to tribes. <br />The Prior FEIR determined that future development under the General Plan <br />could result in ground disturbance that may affect both known and <br />previously unidentified resources associated with Native American tribes. As <br />reflected in more recent CEQA practice, such impacts are typically <br />considered potentially significant because ground disturbance could alter or <br />destroy resources that qualify as TCRs. <br />However, the Prior FEIR also explained that a combination of federal, State, <br />and local regulatory requirements, along with General Plan policies and <br />programs, would reduce these impacts. These protections include <br />requirements to identify and evaluate cultural resources, stop work if <br />resources are discovered, and implement appropriate mitigation in <br />consultation with qualified professionals. The Prior FEIR concluded that <br />impacts would be less than significant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.