My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
09-09
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2026 12:59:11 PM
Creation date
9/10/2026 12:50:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Additional Housing Sites Rezonings Project <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 Addendum Addendum <br /> <br /> <br /> 77 <br />and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse <br />impact that was not previously identified and disclosed in the Prior FEIR. No <br />further analysis is required. <br />iv) Seismic-related Ground Failure, Including Landslides <br />Summary of Prior FEIR <br />Refer to the summary under Impact VII(a)(ii). <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />None of the proposed sites are located within a seismic-induced landslide <br />hazard zone. Despite the lack of risk to these sites, future on-site development <br />would be required to comply with applicable CBC, Municipal Code <br />requirements, and the General Plan in order to protect structures from <br />potential future increase in ground failure or landslide risk. Therefore, impacts <br />would be less than significant, and the proposed project would not result in a <br />new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified and <br />disclosed in the Prior FEIR. No further analysis is required. <br /> <br />b) Soil Erosion or Topsoil Loss <br />Would the project: Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? <br />Summary of Prior FEIR <br />According to the Prior FEIR, development consistent with the General Plan <br />would result in limited grading activities, generally confined to shallow <br />excavations for building pads, foundations, utilities, and access roads, with <br />most ground disturbance involving only minor changes in elevation. Deeper <br />cuts may be required in certain upland or underground utility areas. Related <br />erosion and sedimentation impacts would be minimized through compliance <br />with Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requirements under the <br />National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program, <br />including preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution <br />Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and associated Best Management Practices (BMPs). <br />The City and County also require an Erosion and Sediment Transport Control <br />Plan, designed and overseen by qualified professionals throughout <br />construction. Therefore, with adherence to applicable regulatory measures, <br />soil erosion hazards within the Planning Area would be less than significant. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />Future development at the proposed sites would likely involve construction <br />activities such as stockpiling, grading, excavation, paving, and other earth- <br />disturbing activities that could result in soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. Soil
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.