My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
09-09
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2026 12:59:11 PM
Creation date
9/10/2026 12:50:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Additional Housing Sites Rezonings Project <br />Addendum CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 Addendum <br /> <br /> <br />102 <br />Environmental Issue <br />Area <br />Prior FEIR <br />Determination <br />New or More <br />Severe <br />Impacts? <br />New <br />Circumstances <br />Involving New <br />or More Severe <br />Impacts? <br />New <br />Information <br />Requiring New <br />Analysis or <br />Verification? <br />Applicable <br />Mitigation <br />Measures <br />XI. Land Use and Planning <br />Would the project: <br />a) Physically divide <br />an established <br />community? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No None <br />b) Cause a significant <br />environmental <br />impact due to a <br />conflict with any <br />land use plan, <br />policy, or <br />regulation <br />adopted for the <br />purpose of <br />avoiding or <br />mitigating an <br />environmental <br />effect? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No None <br /> <br />a) Division of an Established Community <br />Would the project: Physically divide an established community? <br />Summary of Prior FEIR <br />The Prior FEIR concluded implementation of the General Plan would not <br />divide an established community or disrupt existing neighborhood cohesion. <br />Instead, its policies promote improved internal connectivity through <br />enhanced transportation networks, expanded pedestrian and bicycle routes, <br />and land use designations that respect and complement surrounding <br />development. The Land Use Element emphasizes maintaining the City’s <br />existing community character and ensuring compatibility between new and <br />existing uses, supporting orderly and logical growth patterns. With these <br />policies and programs in place, implementation of the General Plan would <br />not alter the physical arrangement of established neighborhoods and would <br />result in a less than significant impact on community division. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The application of a new General Plan overlay and rezoning of proposed <br />sites would not create a physical division of an already established <br />community, as typically defined by the construction of a linear feature, such
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.