My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Agenda_Packet_080326
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN AND TRAILS
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
080326
>
_Agenda_Packet_080326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2026 3:23:28 PM
Creation date
9/24/2026 3:22:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/3/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prioritization and Implementation of Proposed Recommendations <br />for the Pleasanton Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update July 21, 2026 <br /> <br />P a g e | 3 <br /> <br />o Comfort <br />o Equity <br />These criteria support the City's goals of accessibility, comfort, and sustainability, while <br />aligning with competitive grant program priorities. <br /> <br />• Lowest Weight (6 points maximum): <br />o Cost <br />Cost was weighted lowest to avoid disproportionately penalizing projects with higher capital <br />costs but substantial community benefits. <br /> <br />The specific evaluation metrics, scoring thresholds, and point allocations for each criterion are <br />summarized in Table 1. <br /> <br /> <br />Table 1: Prioritization Criteria <br /> <br />Community Input <br />Community input was incorporated into the final project rankings through a separate weighting <br />process rather than as an individual scoring criterion. During community outreach , which included <br />two pop-up events, a community meeting, and an online survey , participants were asked to identify <br />and vote for bicycle and pedestrian improvements they viewed as the highest priorities. The <br />Criteria Evaluation Metric Points Criteria Points <br />Safety Presence of fatal/severe injury crash(es) <br />Located on Focused Pedestrian High Injury <br />Corridors and Focused Bicycle High Injury <br />Corridors1 <br />10 <br />All 3 criteria met 8 <br />Meets at least 2 criteria 6 <br />Meets at least 1 criteria 4 <br />Closes gap or provides a Low Stress Facility 8 <br />One better LTS 6 <br />Partial LTS improvement 4 <br />Within ¼ mile of a school 10 <br />Within ½ mile of a school 5 <br />Census Blocks Below 80% of Alameda <br />County AMI 8 <br />Census Blocks Below 80% of Pleasanton <br />AMI (but above 80% of County AMI)4 <br />Low 6 <br />Medium 4 <br />High 2 <br />Sources: <br />1. Pleasanton Travel Action Plan, 2026 <br />2. Needs Assessment and Recommendation Memorandum developed by Toole Design Group <br />3. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2025. AMI for Alameda County for 2025 is $159,800 and for the City of Pleasanton is <br />$190,124. <br />Access to <br />Destinations/ <br />Connection Across <br />Barriers <br />Equity Concentration of disadvantaged populations by Area Median <br />Income (AMI) <br />Cost <br />High-level cost tier based on improvement type. <br />• Bike: Low < $500k), Medium between $500k and $1M, High > <br />$1M <br />• Pedestrian: Low is $10K e.g. signing/striping/signal timing <br />change, Medium is $100K e.g. concrete/minor utility, High is <br />$500K e.g. signal modification/curb changes <br />Note: Where a variety of improvements could be made, average <br />points between a range of improvements are applied. <br />Closes a gap or improves comfort of facility by improving Level of <br />Traffic Stress (LTS)2Comfort <br />Located in high trip potential location (70-85 composite score)2, <br />Improves a connection across a major barrier (e.g. arterial, <br />freeway, ramp, or rail tracks), <br />Connects to a trail <br />Safe Routes to <br />School (SRTS)Project located in proximity to school
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.