My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Agenda_Packet_080326
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN AND TRAILS
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
080326
>
_Agenda_Packet_080326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2026 3:23:28 PM
Creation date
9/24/2026 3:22:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/3/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prioritization and Implementation of Proposed Recommendations <br />for the Pleasanton Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update July 21, 2026 <br /> <br />P a g e | 9 <br /> <br />Master Plan, where it was identified as the highest-priority corridor. This change reflects <br />updates to the prioritization methodology, including greater emphasis on connections to <br />major bicycle and pedestrian destinations, traffic stress levels, and equity <br />considerations. In addition, recently completed improvements between 550 feet west of <br />Payne Road and Hacienda Drive —including intersection enhancements and a quick- <br />build Class IV separated bikeway—have reduced traffic stress and improved walking <br />and bicycling conditions along this portion of the corridor. <br /> <br />Despite its lower overall ranking, West Las Positas Boulevard remains a critical east - <br />west connection on the north side of the city, providing an I -680 crossing and linking <br />neighborhoods with schools and other key destinations. It is located on the bicycle- <br />focused high injury corridor, and the unimproved segments between Foothill Road and <br />550 feet west of Payne Road and between Hacienda Drive and Cranwood Court tied at <br />ranking #6 among the bicycle segment improvements, indicating a continued need for <br />additional investment. While community support for converting the existing quick -build <br />separated bikeway to a permanent facility was low compared to corridors without <br />existing low-stress facilities, the corridor overall received strong community support , <br />underscoring its continued importance as a multimodal corridor. <br /> <br />Additional Corridor Considerations (#10 to #17) <br />The remaining corridors ranked lower overall but continue to represent important connections <br />within the City’s bicycle and pedestrian network. Several of these corridors provide key citywide <br />or regional connections, including access across I-680, connections to BART, and links to <br />surrounding communities. However, these corridors ranked relatively lower either because they <br />don’t meet or partially meet the evaluation criteria, have very high implementation costs, or <br />lower community support. <br />• Foothill Road, Stoneridge Drive, Hopyard Road – These corridors are important <br />north-south and east-west corridors that serve both local and regional travel beyond <br />Pleasanton. These corridors received moderate to high community support but ranked <br />lower overall because they are lengthy corridors and several study segment s or <br />intersections received lower technical scores, reducing the overall corridor score. <br />Implementing low-stress bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the full length of these <br />corridors would require substantial capital investment, phased implementation, and <br />competitive grant funding due to their scale and complexity. <br />• BART Access Corridors (Willow Road, Iron Horse Trail Extension, Stoneridge Mall <br />Road, Owens Drive) - These corridors provide important first-/last-mile connections to <br />BART and the regional transit network. Although they ranked lower due to lower <br />technical scores, lower community support, or higher implementation costs, public <br />outreach highlighted improved transit access as an important community priority. <br />• Dorman Road - Dorman Road represents a lower-cost neighborhood improvement <br />opportunity focused on school access. <br />Implementation <br />Based on the corridor evaluation, corridors were further categorized as Priority Corridors, Major <br />Capital Corridors, or Opportunity Corridors (see Appendix B). These categories are intended to <br />guide implementation by considering both the corridor ranking and additional factors such as <br />project scale, implementation complexity, funding needs, and ongoing City efforts. While the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.