Laserfiche WebLink
<br />P a g e | 1 <br /> <br />Memorandum <br /> <br />Date: July 21, 2026 <br /> <br />To: Matthew Nelson, City of Pleasanton <br /> <br />From: Shikha Jain <br />Ethan Heckman <br /> <br />Subject: Prioritization and Implementation of Proposed Recommendations for the Pleasanton <br />Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update <br /> <br /> <br />Hexagon Transportation Consultants has completed a prioritization assessment of the proposed <br />bicycle and pedestrian improvements outlined in the needs assessment and recommendations <br />memorandum developed by Toole Design Group for the Pleasanton Bicycle and Pedestrian Master <br />Plan update (Appendix A). Based on a combination of technical criteria and community input <br />described below, a prioritization ranking was developed for each individual bicycle and pedestrian <br />project, and the focus network corridors. <br />The project and corridor rankings in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan were developed to help <br />organize and prioritize potential improvements. The rankings are intended to serve as a planning <br />tool for comparing needs and identifying a general order for implementation. However, the rankings <br />are only one factor considered by Traffic Engineering when determining how and when to advance <br />improvements and allocate available funding. <br />Implementation decisions are also informed by other important considerations, including project <br />readiness, coordination with planned roadway or utility work, grant funding opportunities, safety <br />needs, community input, operational considerations, and availa ble budget. As a result, the ranked <br />order in the Master Plan does not, by itself, obligate the City to construct projects in strict sequence <br />or within a specific timeframe. <br />Prioritization Criteria <br />The project prioritization framework evaluated 25 bicycle segment improvements and 56 pedestrian <br />intersection improvements using six criteria: safety, destination access and barrier connectivity, <br />facility comfort, Safe Routes to School (SRTS), equity, and planning -level cost. <br /> <br />Safety evaluated whether a project is located on the Focused Pedestrian High Injury Corridor and <br />the Focused Bicycle High Injury Corridor addressing locations with a history of severe or fatal <br />crashes. The bicycle and pedestrian high injury corridors were developed in the City’s 2026 Travel <br />Action Plan. <br /> <br />Access to Destinations and Barrier Connectivity assessed how effectively a project improves <br />connections to key destinations such as downtown, schools, BART, trails etc. and overcomes <br />barriers to walking and bicycling, such as, freeways, arterials, and rail corridors. Connections to key <br />destinations was based on the trip potential analysis completed by Toole Design Group , and <br />connection across barriers was based on aerial review. <br />