My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Agenda_Packet_092826
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN AND TRAILS
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
092826
>
_Agenda_Packet_092826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2026 3:28:31 PM
Creation date
9/24/2026 3:25:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/28/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Prioritization and Implementation of Proposed Recommendations <br />for the Pleasanton Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Update August 18, 2026 <br /> <br /> <br />• #6 Black Avenue between Hopyard Road and Santa Rita Road: Black Avenue <br />ranked among the higher-scoring corridors due to its neighborhood connectivity, access <br />to schools, and relatively low implementation cost. The corridor received moderate <br />community support. The Santa Rita Road/Black Avenue intersection ranked among the <br />top five pedestrian improvement projects. <br /> <br />• #7 Case Avenue between Bernal Avenue and Valley Avenue: Case Avenue ranked <br />among the higher scoring corridors based on its access to two schools, Downtown, and <br />potential to improve bicycle facility comfort. The corridor has an existing southbound <br />Class IV separated bikeway along the school frontages. The Plan recommends <br />converting the existing northbound Class II bicycle lane to a Class IV separated bikeway. <br />During the walk audit, students accessing the schools were observed entering the <br />southbound Class IV separated bikeway along the school frontages and traveling in the <br />wrong direction; a separated facility on the opposite side of the roadway could help <br />address this behavior. The corridor received lower community support, likely due to the <br />existing low stress bicycle facility along the school frontages. <br /> <br />• #8 Greenwood Road/Harvest Road between Mohr Avenue and Del Valle Parkway: <br />Greenwood Road/Harvest Road ranked among the higher scoring corridors due to its <br />access to schools, neighborhood connectivity, and relatively low implementation cost. <br />The corridor received lower community support. The crossing improvements at the <br />Greenwood Road/Valley Avenue intersection ranked high (#6) in pedestrian <br />improvements. <br /> <br />• #9 W Las Positas Boulevard between Foothill Road and Cranwood Court: West Las <br />Positas Boulevard ranked lower in this Plan than in the 2018 Bicycle and Pedestrian <br />Master Plan, where it was identified as the highest-priority corridor. This change reflects <br />updates to the prioritization methodology, including greater emphasis on connections to <br />major bicycle and pedestrian destinations, traffic stress levels, and equity <br />considerations. In addition, recently completed improvements between 550 feet west of <br />Payne Road and Hacienda Drive—including intersection enhancements and a quick- <br />build Class IV separated bikeway—have reduced traffic stress and improved walking <br />and bicycling conditions along this portion of the corridor. <br /> <br />Despite its lower overall ranking, West Las Positas Boulevard remains a critical east - <br />west connection on the north side of the city, providing an I-680 crossing and linking <br />neighborhoods with schools and other key destinations. It is located on the bicycle- <br />focused high injury corridor, and the unimproved segments between Foothill Road and <br />550 feet west of Payne Road and between Hacienda Drive and Cranwood Court tied at <br />ranking #6 among the bicycle segment improvements, indicating a continued need for <br />additional investment. While community support for converting the existing quick-build <br />separated bikeway to a permanent facility was low compared to corridors without <br />existing low-stress facilities, the corridor overall received strong community support, <br />underscoring its continued importance as a multimodal corridor. <br /> <br />Additional Corridor Considerations (#10 to #17) <br />The remaining corridors ranked lower overall but continue to represent important connections <br />within the City’s bicycle and pedestrian network. Several of these corridors provide key citywide <br />or regional connections, including access across I-680, connections to BART, and links to <br />surrounding communities. However, these corridors ranked relatively lower either because they
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.