My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SYCAMORE FUNDING DEVELOMENT CO
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
LONG TERM AGREEMENT
>
S
>
SYCAMORE FUNDING DEVELOMENT CO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2026 12:46:28 PM
Creation date
10/12/2026 12:44:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DOCUMENT DATE
10/21/2008
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - NAME
SYCAMORE FUNDING DEVELOPMENT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - TYPE
MISC AGMT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - RECORD SERIES
704-06 (Long Term Agreements)
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DESTRUCTION DATE
PERMANENT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - NOTES
REPAIR AND PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HE CITY OF <br /> .� m9 <br /> e.,. <br /> LEASAINTONo <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> Date: October 3, 2008 <br /> To: Nelson Fialho, City Manager <br /> From: Jim Kelcourse, City Engineer <br /> Subject: Cost sharing of storm drain/erosion repairs to the Lund Ranch Tank Access Road <br /> The Lund Ranch Water Tank Access Road and storm drain system is in need of repairs. The drainage <br /> ditch on the south side of the access road collects runoff from the roadway and then directs water <br /> underground into a drainage pipe. In collecting flows, the inlet has plugged with leaves and debris and <br /> has allowed water to overflow and create voids adjacent to the inlet and along the 12-inch pipe under the <br /> roadway. In addition to the undermining of the access road piping and the inlet, significant erosion has <br /> occurred on the roadway down slope. As a result,the existing rip-rap structure on the down slope has <br /> failed. The developer, Greenbriar Homes,put in these storm drain improvements years ago and the <br /> improvements were accepted by the City. There have been several discussions about these repairs and <br /> Greenbriar has hired the firm of ENGEO to come up with some proposed design solutions. We have <br /> reviewed the proposed changes and have some minor modifications to their plans, but believe that if our <br /> changes are incorporated,the proposed changes can provide a solution to the problem. <br /> In our meetings with Greenbriar, we both recognized the need to complete the improvements before the <br /> winter rains begin, since we could encounter additional damage due to storm flows. In discussing <br /> responsibility for the improvements, they cite the lack of ongoing maintenance of the channel, additional <br /> flows into drainage system when flushing the City's water tank, and the fact the improvements were <br /> accepted by the City back in January of 2002. We believe the original design required too much <br /> ongoing maintenance to be successful and it's hard to assess whether the tank's discharge had any or no <br /> effect on the system. Greenbriar, in an effort to reach a compromise,has suggested that they hire a <br /> contractor to perform the work per ENGEO's recommended design changes and split the construction <br /> costs with the City. In an effort to resolve this issue in a timely manner and avoid additional damage <br /> and costs, it is recommended that we move forward with the repairs. Greenbriar has estimated the <br /> construction costs at$94,000. As part of the CIP program, we specifically included$75,000 for erosion <br /> and storm repairs for this type of repairs. Therefore, it is recommended that we have Greenbriar <br /> perform the work and reimburse them for our share of the cost, estimated at$56,400, which includes a <br /> 20%contingency. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.