Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Rondash advised that the applicant provided an initial Green Point checklist and that the applicant <br />had an infill site. Convenience stores, child care, pharmacies, and banks are located nearby, and the <br />project automatically achieved green points. The applicant also incorporated common sense and <br />practical features into the design of the unit, both on the whole design approach and the individual <br />occupant/user levels. She delineated several green building features proposed by the applicant The <br />option of using photo voltaic energy has met with some resistance by the developer due to cost and <br />mechanism equipment complications. Staff inquired whether solar power should be required and <br />whether it should be conditioned with this project In addition, there was a choice of solar-ready or full <br />installation at construction. She discussed the storm water mnoff and bioswale details. <br /> <br />Staff has concems and would like direction on whether a bioswale was the desired solution for <br />stormwater treatment or ifthe applicant should be directed to explore other options. The initial <br />envirornnent study was being prepared by staff, and the initial impacts are associated with hydrology <br />and water quality, geosoils, population and housing, and traffic and transportation issues. Staff believed <br />these impacts can be mitigated through the conditions of approval. The applicant is cUlTently working <br />with Zone 7 on appropriate creek setback, which will be incorporated into the initial study and review of <br />the envirornnental impacts of the project. Staff believed that this project can then result in a mitigated <br />negative declaration being noticed and brought forward with the staff report at the final hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether the bioswale's location between the high-density apartments and <br />the new complex would bring a risk of water being retained in that area as well as a risk of mosquitoes <br />being attracted to that area. Ms. Rondash advised that the project is required to drain at a celiain rate, <br />which would prohibit the accumulation of standing water. The project has the benefit of the natural <br />grade sloping from the front (Vineyard Avenue) to the rear (where the creek is), so there should be <br />positive flow. The developer is required to enter into a maintenance agreement, and the Homeowners <br />Association would be required to maintain the bioswale. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts whether the hammerhead turn-aroUlld was within <br />100 feet of the top of the arroyo, Ms. Rondash replied that staff would work with Zone 7 to ensure there <br />be no encroachments within the arroyo setback areas; the applicant is currently working with Zone 7 to <br />determine an appropriate setback. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts whether a sidewalk to be placed on Birch Creek <br />Way would provide parking, Ms. Soo confirmed it would provide onstreet parking. Commissioner <br />Roberts advised that there was already parking there. Ms. Rondash advised that the applicant is <br />proposing improvements to delineate the parking spaces more clearly. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank parking, Ms. Soo confirmed that tlle guest parking <br />exceeded the Code requirement of seven spaces. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />John McMorrow, Silverstone CommUllities, applicant, believed this process would result in 3 better <br />project. He displayed the elevations on the easels and noted that an elevated section would enable more <br />water to go into the bioswale. He requested the Commission's feedback on colors. <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, October 26, 2005 <br /> <br />Page 2 of5 <br />