My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:060
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2007 4:06:08 PM
Creation date
2/15/2006 4:39:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:060
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />who have more than two vehicles. Given the existing parking situation, some of the neighbors <br />requested the number of units to be reduced. <br /> <br />The neighborhood meeting collectively illustrated that the surrounding residents feel that <br />proposed project is well designed, however, it needs to contain more guest parking, given that <br />the current parking problems of the neighborhood. The neighbors pointed out the potential <br />parking impacts that will be generated when multiple project residents own more than two (2) <br />vehicles per unit. <br /> <br />The current plans were adjusted to incorporate three (3) additional guest parking spaces on-site, <br />bringing the total to 13 guest parking spaces. The proposed guest parking would exceed the <br />number of guest parking spaces required by the parking ordinance for guest parking of a <br />multiple family development (seven guest parking spaces would be required by the parking <br />ordinance for a multi-family project). As previously mentioned, the subject site is surrounded <br />by high-density residential development to the east and west. The residents indicated that they <br />have experienced parking shortage within the existing apartment complex as the tenants of the <br />apartment complex park vehicles onto single-family residential street on the south side of <br />Vineyard Avenue. To ensure that the proposed development would have minimal impact on <br />parking, staff recommends that the applicant review the area that was originally designated for a <br />tot area for additional guest parking spaces. Staff has added a condition to maximize the <br />parking on site. <br /> <br />Staff notes that the parking enforcement would be the responsibility of the homeowners <br />association and/or the management company for the project. The enforcement measures would <br />be addressed in the CC&Rs. <br /> <br />Green Building <br /> <br />The applicant has provided the initial Green point checklist, identifying the design elements for <br />the project to meet the Green Building requirements. <br /> <br />The project is an infill site, benefiting by being in close proximity to many of the services that <br />are considered essential to daily living (convenience grocery shop, child daycare facility, <br />pharmacy, bank, etc.). These factors enable the project to automatically achieve many Green <br />points. Additionally, the applicant has incorporated practical features into the design of the units <br />on both a whole design approach and an individual occupant/user level. For example, the <br />construction of the buildings utilizes such things as FSC certified wood, engineered lumber, and <br />high performance windows. These items are readily available to contractors and are well known <br />within the construction community. Other measures that have been identified by the developer <br />include the use of Energy Star appliances, high efficiency lighting, and water-efficient fixtures. <br />Although these measures are not to the developers benefit, they are what surveys show to be in- <br /> <br />Case No. PUD-49 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page - 8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.