My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95024X
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95024X
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 11:10:33 AM
Creation date
2/25/1999 5:48:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-- Financial Plan <br /> <br /> Potential Future Funding Sources <br /> <br /> Other future funding sources have been discussed for the Tri-Valley. Alameda County <br /> has discussed a Tier 2 funding program, which includes a 10-cent regional gas tax and <br /> a continuation of Measure B. There is also the State and Local Transportation <br />-- Partnership Progrnm (SLTPP), which could provide up to 50 percent reimbursement of <br /> construction costs. The Mid-State Toll Road has also been proposed to provide trans- <br /> portation capacity in the Route 84 corridor without public investment. The major <br /> - potential future sources are discussed briefly below, although because of their uncer- <br /> tainty, the Tri-Valley Transportation Plan does not rely on their provision. <br /> <br />__ County Sales Tax Measures <br /> <br /> The county sales tax measures, currently funding several transportation improve- <br />_ ments, have a limited life span. Measure B in Alameda County will expire in 2002. <br /> Measure C in Contra Costa County will expire in 2008. There is a chance that these <br /> sales tax programs, through a successful election, could be extended. They were <br /> originally passed with a simple majority vote. Recent court decisions in other counties, <br /> however, have shown that a two-thirds vote may be required to enact future tax <br /> initiatives. Achieving a super majority at the polls is considered nearly impossible for <br /> a proposed tax increase ballot measure. <br /> <br /> County Gas Tax/Regional Gas Tax <br /> <br />' A county tax or regional tax may be imposed on motor vehicle fuels for the purposes of <br /> transportation investment according to enabling state legislation which was adopted in <br /> 1981. The tax would be imposed in increments of one cent per gallon per year with no <br /> state-imposed lifetime limit. Prior to imposition and collection of a tax, a proposition <br /> granting authority to the county to impose the tax must be submitted and approved by <br /> the voters at an election. A proposition may be submitted to the voters only if a <br /> written agreement is made with respect to allocation of the revenues between the <br /> county and the cities. <br /> <br />-- Additional gas taxes would provide several benefits. Drivers will look for alternatives <br /> to the private automobile as driving costs (e.g., increased fuel prices) increase, <br /> reducing systemwide demands. Demand may be reduced by telecommuting, fide- <br />-- sharing, transit, or linking trip purposes. The additional revenue obtained as a result <br /> of the higher tax would create a larger "pot of money" for transportation related <br /> projects. <br /> <br /> TOll Financing <br /> <br />_ A toll road, the Mid-State Toll Road, has been proposed for the Route 84 corridor, <br /> connecting between 1-680 in Sunol and the Antioch area. The toll road is now in the <br /> planning stages, with an environmental impact report (EIR) under development. At <br /> _ the request of MTC and Tri-Valley agencies, the EIR will study several options in the <br /> <br /> Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 158 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.