My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95097
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2012 1:55:52 PM
Creation date
2/26/1999 4:46:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/15/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS <br /> TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL <br /> COMBINED STUDY <br /> July 1995 <br /> <br /> 2.1.4 Review the results of these analysis with each <br /> jurisdiction. The selection of alternatives for <br /> evaluation and study is subject to review and <br /> approval of the affected jurisdiction. <br /> <br />2.2 ISOLATE AND DESCRIBE OTHER CONSTRAINTS AFFECTING VOLUMES <br /> <br /> Review adjacent intersections, in particular signalized <br /> intersections at freeway interchanges, to determine if traffic <br /> volume destined to, (projected at), the critical intersections <br /> would face significant constraints in reaching the <br /> intersection i.e. would volume be metered at some adjacent <br /> location resulting in lower volumes than projected? <br /> <br /> 2.2.1 Quantify any improvement in v/C related to such <br /> metering effect <br /> <br /> 2.2.2 If problem appears to be relocated subjectively <br /> discuss any new problem. <br /> <br />2.3 IDENTIFY AND EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br /> List, define and evaluate alternative actions which can <br /> mitigate projected LOS violations. Evaluation should include <br /> order of magnitude cost estimates, funding strategy, degree of <br /> effectiveness and any ongoing operational and maintenance <br /> needs. The selection of alternatives for evaluation and study <br /> is subject to review and approval of the affected <br /> jurisdictions. <br /> <br /> 2.3.1 Consider and Evaluate Growth Management Strategies <br /> <br /> Consider and evaluate growth management strategies in the <br /> event that intersection capacities cannot be adequately <br /> improved. Strategies may include phasing of development and <br /> reductions in land use intensity. Consideration should be <br /> given to pro rata share of traffic contributed by each <br /> jurisdiction to each of the problem locations <br /> <br /> 2.3.2 Consider and Evaluated Traffic Demand Management <br /> (TDM) Strategies or other Measures to Meet TSO <br /> Requirements <br /> <br /> -6- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.