Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS <br /> TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL <br /> COMBINED STUDY <br /> July 1995 <br /> <br /> ei-580/680 Direct connector Project with Hook Ramps <br /> eWest Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station <br /> eRoute 84 from 1-580 to 1-680 <br /> ei-680 Auxiliary Lanes Diablo Road to Bollinger Canyon <br /> ei-580 HOV Lanes Tassajara to N. Livermore <br /> ei-680 HOV Lanes Rout 84 to Sunol Grade <br /> ei-580 Foothill Road/San Ramon Blvd Interchange <br /> eAlcosta Interchange <br /> eCrow Canyon Road Safety Improvements <br /> eVasco Road Realignment <br /> eExpress Bus Service <br /> <br />3.1 UPDATE PROJECT COST ESTIMATES <br /> <br /> Update Cost Estimates with currently available cost <br /> information from Caltrans, Alameda County Transportation <br /> Authority and their consultant, from Bart and other sources. <br /> <br />3.2 PROJECT COMPLETION TIMETABLE <br /> <br /> Determine Preliminary Project Time Line and Expected <br /> Construction Dates for those projects with currently available <br /> funding and schedules; 1-580/680 flyover, Bart West Dublin, <br /> Pleasanton, Isabel Parkway extension/Highway 84. The <br /> information is to be used in determining needed cash flow. <br /> <br />3.3 NEXUS ANALYSIS <br /> <br /> Provide nexus analysis for new development in relation to each <br /> of the projects. The analysis will utilize the updated Tri- <br /> Valley Model using ABAG '94 Land use Projections and include <br /> quantification of non Tri-Valley Traffic percentages. The <br /> BART Environmental Document will also be used as input. The <br /> analysis must recognize and use for comparison those units to <br /> be built after the fee is implemented and take into account <br /> vested projects. The year 1996 shall be considered the first <br /> year for fee purposes. <br /> <br />3.4 ECONOMIC BURDEN ANALYSIS SUMMARY REPORT <br /> <br /> Provide a summary report of Economic Burden Analysis for new <br /> development in each jurisdiction and the application of this <br /> analysis toward setting the amount and proportion of traffic <br /> impact fees which could be paid by the residential and <br /> <br /> -8- <br /> <br /> <br />