Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS <br /> TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL <br /> COMBINED STUDY <br /> July 1995 <br /> <br /> business sector. The analysis shall include an assessment of <br /> those current assessments for regional traffic fees, local <br /> traffic fees and any other obligations and assessments. <br /> This would address the need for "credits" for properties <br /> currently contributing toward regional transportation <br /> improvements. <br /> <br />-. 3.4.1 Vested Development <br /> <br /> Evaluate alternative funding strategies to account <br /> for traffic impacts resulting from the construction <br /> of vested development in the Tri-Valley. <br /> <br /> 3.5 REVIEW GROWTH and REVENUE PROJECTIONS <br /> <br /> Review growth projections and recommend estimates to be used <br /> in estimating revenues from development fees. Compare growth <br /> projections with historic growth rates in the Tri-Valley. <br /> Revenue sources shall include those used in MTC "Track I" and <br /> "Track II" and Alameda County CMA "Tier II." <br /> <br /> 3.5.1 Summarize by jurisdiction land use categories and <br /> quantity of units <br /> <br /> 3.5.2 Evaluate alternative (to Development Fees) funding <br /> sources and relate applicability to each project. <br /> Matching funds will be required to assist in <br /> funding the list of projects. An assessment of <br /> known funding sources and availability of funding <br /> will be required. Sources of information are the <br /> MTC and County CMA agencies. The summary of new <br /> funding sources should summarize by funding source <br /> estimates of Tri-Valley revenue share, competing <br /> projects and ability to meet funding needs of <br /> assisting in funding specific projects listed for <br /> development fees. Consideration shall be given to <br /> options of tolls for funding Highway 84, including <br /> cost of free alternatives and impacts of toll <br /> segment on overall transportation system. <br /> <br /> 3.6 PROJECT PRIORITIES <br /> <br /> Provide a cost/utility index and matrix for each project to <br /> prioritized projects. Ratings for the utility index will be <br /> <br /> -9- <br /> <br /> <br />