Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 4 <br />Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures <br />H. Hydrology, Drainage. and Water Quality <br /> <br />development. However facilities that control peak flow rates usually allow the cumulative <br />duration of peak flows to increase over time, which can still cause increased erosion of the <br />downstream system. Protecting these stream systems from hydromodification requires <br />management measures that control the duration of a range of geomorphically significant <br />flows - those capable of moving sediment and eroding stream bank material. These <br />processes are most affected by small, frequent storms that become much more frequent <br />when development occurs in the watershed. In many parts of North America, observations <br />that peak flow controls alone are not adequate for erosion control have initiated revisions to <br />stormwater requirements to incorporate a flow duration standard, where pre. and post- <br />development flow duration curves must be matched according to specified criteria. <br /> <br />Flow Duration Control requires that the increase in surface runoff created by the installation <br />of impervious surfaces be retained onsite with gradual discharge either to groundwater <br />through infiltration, reduction by evapotranspiration, and/or discharge to the downstream <br />watercourse at a level less than the critical flow for bed and bank mobility of the stream. <br /> <br />Pleasanton recognizes that impacts related to flooding and hydromodification could occur <br />as a result of the type of development proposed. Therefore, the Specific Plan specifies that <br />all projects covered under the C.3 NPDES Permit and implemented under the Specific Plan <br />will fully comply with permit requirements. The detention basins have been sized to accom- <br />modate anticipated development and designed to be operated in a manner that the post- <br />development storm hydrograph closely resembles the predevelopment storm hydrograph. <br /> <br />In addition, as required by City ordinance, all drainage components will be designed in <br />compliance with City of Pleasanton standards. The City of Pleasanton Department of Public <br />Works will, under existing requirements, review the grading and drainage plans for <br />compliance with these requirements. <br /> <br />No adverse environmental impacts relating to flooding and hydromodification would occur <br />because the Specific Plan contains adequate provisions to mitigate these potential impacts. <br /> <br />(2) Stormwater Quality Degradation <br /> <br />Construction Period Impacts <br /> <br />Construction and grading within the project site would require temporary disturbance of <br />surface soils and vegetative cover and could result in exposure of soil to runoff, potentially <br />causing erosion and entrainment of sediment in the runoff. Soil stockpiles and excavated <br />areas would be exposed to runoff and, if not managed properly, the runoff could cause <br />erosion and increased sedimentation in downstream creeks and stormwater conveyance <br />facilities of the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br />The potential for chemical releases is present at most construction sites. Once released, <br />substances such as fuels, oils, paints, and solvents could be transported to surface waters <br />and/or groundwater in stormwater runoff, wash water, and dust control water, potentially <br />reducing the quality of the receiving waters. A potential impact on runoff water quality <br />during construction is a potentially significant impact. <br /> <br />89 <br />