Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 4 <br />Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures <br />J. Noise <br /> <br />Project Generated Traffic. Traffic volumes would increase with the development of the <br />project as a result of people accessing project facilities and increased traffic as a result of the <br />development of the roadway system through the Plan area. Based on EXISTING and <br />EXI5TING+APPROVED+PROJECT traffic volumes supplied by Dowling Associates, Inc., the only <br />significant traffic noise increases resulting from project-generated traffic would be along the <br />proposed roadway extension (discussed below). Project generated traffic is calculated to <br />increase noise levels by 1 to 2 dB along Meadowlark Drive, south of Bernal Drive, resulting <br />in traffic noise levels of about 57 dBA Ldn (based on traffic noise modeling) at a distance of <br />50 feet from the center of the roadway. This increase would not be considered significant. <br />Traffic noise levels along the remaining streets in the vicinity of the project are not calculated <br />to measurably increase as a result of project generated traffic. <br /> <br />In addition to project generated noise increases along the existing roadway sections, the <br />project would extend Pleasanton Avenue from Laguna Creek Lane through to Bernal Avenue. <br />There are no existing noise sensitive uses along the new section of the Pleasanton Avenue <br />Extension. Based on CUMULATIVE+PRO)ECT traffic volumes supplied by Dowling Associates, <br />Inc., traffic along the Pleasanton Avenue Extension is calculated to generate noise levels of <br />about 65 dBA Ldn at a distance of 50 feet from the center of the roadway. These noise levels <br />would be considered "normally acceptable" with the proposed land uses (see Excess Noise <br />Levels). <br /> <br />Cumulative Traffic. Traffic volumes and the associated noise levels would increase over <br />time in the area with the development of the Pleasanton General Plan. Some of these <br />increases would be considered significant (greater than 3 dBA). However, based on <br />EXISTING, CUMULATIVE, and CUMULATIVE+PRO)ECT traffic volumes supplied by Dowling Asso- <br />ciates, Inc., the project would not measurably add to significant cumulative traffic noise <br />increases except along the roadway extensions of Valley Avenue and the Pleasanton Avenue <br />Extension (as discussed previously). <br /> <br />Lighted Sports Fields. Various sports and recreation areas are proposed for sub-area 2. In <br />addition, the ballpark area and the potential outdoor amphitheater would include lights, <br />which would allow nighttime activities and events in these areas. Noise would be generated <br />primarily from vehicular traffic (discussed previously), small crowd game cheering, and <br />amplified announcements or events. <br /> <br />The location of these areas in the center of the site would provide noise attenuation from <br />outdoor recreational activities to the residential uses to the west. The Initial Study and <br />Negative Declaration for the Bernal baseball fields found that noise created by cheering at <br />baseball games would be adequately reduced by the more that 800-foot open space buffer <br />between the fields and the nearest residential neighborhood. Amplified sound for <br />announcing ball games is planned to consist of temporary tabletop systems, until potentially <br />more permanent facilities can be provided in future phases of the Bernal Community Park. <br />Amplified sound would be directed downward toward the viewing terraces and infields only. <br />Given the existing traffic noise levels in the area and the site's proximity to 1-680 and Bernal <br />Avenue, and given the distance that the outdoor playing fields are located away from the <br />nearest housing, the increase in noise levels would be insignificant. For additional <br />background information please refer to the Phase I Bernal EIR. <br /> <br />109 <br />