Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Environmental Impact Report <br />Bernal Property Phase II Specific Plan <br /> <br /> <br />1 . Framework for Analysis <br /> <br />This section discusses the traffic and circulation impacts of the proposed Bernal Property <br />Phase II Specific Plan and the BCP Master Plan, including automobile traffic (traffic gener- <br />ated by the project and its effects on peak hour operations of intersections) and other trans- <br />portation system components (parking, bicycle and pedestrian movement, and transit). <br /> <br />Analysis of traffic impacts takes place within the context of Pleasanton's roadway network <br />and the City's existing and projected traffic. As described in the setting section below, Pleas- <br />anton already has numerous intersections at which existing traffic volumes exceed what can <br />be accommodated at the level of service (LOS) called for in the General Plan, which is LOS <br />D. The exceedances of the General Plan standard would occur whether or not the Bernal <br />Property Phase II Specific Plan is adopted and implemented, and the Specific Plan would <br />account for only a minor share of the future traffic projected for these intersections. Never- <br />theless, the Specific Plan's contribution to future deficiencies at these intersections would be <br />considered an adverse impact and, therefore, this transportation analysis has been con- <br />ducted to (1) estimate future project traffic, (2) assign that traffic to roadway links and <br />intersections, and (3) determine the project's level of responsibility for the improvements <br />that may be put in place in the future to improve traffic operations. <br /> <br />The analysis of Phase II Specific Plan traffic impacts involves multiple sequential steps, with <br />the conclusions of each step reviewed for reasonableness before proceeding with the next <br />step. The sequence of steps in the traffic analysis for Phase II Specific Plan was as follows: <br /> <br />Traffic Task <br />1) Forecast project related trips <br /> <br />Method or Tool Applied <br /> <br />Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE) Manual trip rates <br />were supplemented by specific information on planned <br />uses. Daily and peak hour AM and PM trips were estimated <br />for the each of the Specific Plan's 16 sub-areas (including <br />the Bernal Community Park in sub-area 2) as the aggregate <br />of the trips attracted to or leaving the land uses located in <br />that sub-area. <br /> <br />For each of four future scenarios: <br />2) Assign trips to road network <br /> <br />The Pleasanton travel demand model43 was used to distrib- <br />ute daily and peak hour traffic to and from the project site <br />to the future roadway network. <br /> <br />43 The Pleasanton Traffic Model is a comprehensive local traffic model that integrates Pleasanton's roadway <br />network with local land use data in order to be able to accurately assign traffic from potential future projects <br />to the transportation system. <br /> <br />128 <br />