Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 4 <br />Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures <br />O. Transportation and Traffic <br /> <br />Additions of the travel lane where indicated would provide adequate capacity for project <br />traffic under both APPROVEO+PROjECT and CUMULATIVE+PROjECT scenarios, reducing the impact <br />to the less-than-significant level. The project should contribute its fair share of the cost for <br />these projects through the updated traffic impact fee program called for in Measure 01 c. <br /> <br />Significance Post-mitigation: less than significant. <br /> <br />e. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> <br />Significance post-mitigation: S =signiflcant; LS = less than significant; (C) = contributes to cumulative impact. <br /> <br />1m act Miti ation Measure <br />Measures 01a, 01b, and 01c are all re uired. <br /> <br />01 a. The project would contribute 01 a. Implementing intersection <br />to unsatisfactory levels of improvements described <br />service at 25 intersections under Measure 01 a would <br />under the maintain LOS D or better <br />APPROVED+PROjECTSCenario. conditions at 23 intersections <br />under the APPROVED+ PROJECT <br />scenario. <br /> <br />01 b. The project would contribute <br />to unsatisfactory levels of <br />service at 24 intersections <br />under the CUMULATIVE+PROjECT <br />scenario. <br /> <br />OJ c. Same as 01 a and 01 b. <br /> <br />OJ a and 01 b: The project will <br />cause an increase in traffic <br />under the CUMULATIVE+PROjECT <br />scenario at the locations <br />identified in the text, for which <br />feasible mitigations have not <br />been identified. <br /> <br />01 b.lmplementing intersection <br />improvements described <br />under Measure 01 b would <br />maintain LOS D or better <br />conditions at 22 intersections <br />under the CUMULATIVE+PROjECT <br />scenario. <br /> <br />01 c. Update the City's traffic impact <br />fee program to finance the <br />improvements needed to <br />maintain satisfactory levels of <br />service where feasi ble and <br />desired. <br /> <br />01. Implementing intersection <br />improvements as provided for <br />under Measure 01 a, -b, and -c <br />would not be sufficient to main- <br />tain LOS D or better conditions <br />at two intersections under the <br />CUMULATIVE+PROJECT scenario: <br />Bernal @ 1-680 SB <br />Hopyard @ Owens <br /> <br />Post- <br />Mitigation <br />Si nificance <br /> <br />LS <br /> <br />SU,C <br /> <br />151 <br />