My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 06035
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
RES 06035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2006 4:17:08 PM
Creation date
6/7/2006 4:02:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2006
DOCUMENT NO
RES 06035
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Pleasanton <br />Bernal Property Phase II Specific Plan EI R <br /> <br />n. Parks and Recreation <br /> <br />The assessment of impacts on parks and recreation presented in Chapter 4 also applies to <br />Alternatives 1 and 2. <br /> <br />o. Transportation and Traffic <br /> <br />The traffic analysis found that impacts of Alternative 2 would be slightly greater than for the <br />project and Alternative 1, as noted below. <br /> <br />For the most part, however, as discussed in the transportation section of Chapter 4, the <br />unsatisfactory LOS levels at key Pleasanton intersections that have been forecast to occur <br />with the implementation of the project would exist even in the absence of the project, as well <br />as Alternatives 1 and 2. <br /> <br />Therefore, this alternatives discussion focuses on site plan issues rather than Citywide <br />issues. <br /> <br />(1) Traffic <br /> <br />Alternative 1 <br /> <br />Alternative 1 is projected to generate peak hour trips equivalent to the proposed project. <br />The same impacts would result as are forecast to result from the project, and the same <br />mitigation measures would be required. <br /> <br />The shifting of the football/lacrosse field to a location near the cultural arts center would <br />shift some traffic from Pleasanton Avenue (and the Bernal Avenue/Pleasanton Avenue <br />intersection) to Case Avenue. This would slightly increase traffic on Case Avenue while <br />easing traffic volumes at the Bernal Avenue/Pleasanton Avenue intersection. The shifted <br />uses, however, do not generate high levels of peak hour traffic and therefore should not <br />result in new significant impacts. <br /> <br />Alternative 2 <br /> <br />Again, overall peak hour trips would be about the same as the project, and in general the <br />impacts are similar. However, the relocation of the CAC and the inclusion of the ACE train <br />station will result in different traffic patterns from those projected for the proposed project. <br />Specifically, the relocation of the CAC to the center of the site near the intersection of Valley <br />Avenue and Pleasanton Avenue would encourage more traffic to use the intersection of <br />Bernal Avenue/Valley Avenue and the future intersections of Valley Avenue/Case Avenue/ <br />junipero Street, and junipero Street/Sunol Boulevard. With the proposed mitigation <br />measures recommended for the cumulative plus project condition, it is likely that this <br />alternative would require additional mitigation at those four intersections. <br /> <br />178 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.