Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 6 <br />Cumulative and Growth-Inducing Impacts <br />and Other Environmental Considerations <br /> <br />Table 16 <br />Cumulative Impacts Summary <br /> <br />Topic <br />A. Aesthetics Visual Resources <br />B. Agricultural Resources <br /> <br />C. Air Quali <br /> <br />D. Biological Resources <br /> <br /> <br />E. <br />F. <br />G. <br /> <br />Noise <br />o en S ace <br />Po ulation and Housin <br />M. Public Services <br />Ml. Police Protection <br />M2. Fire Protection <br />M3. Schools <br />N. Parks and Recreation <br />O. Transportation and Traffic <br /> <br /> <br />P. Utilities and Service S stems <br /> <br />Cumulative Impacts <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Bl. Conversion of Bernal Property lands to urban <br />uses would have an adverse impact on <br />agricultural resources, both for the project (the <br />Phase II S ecific Plan and cumulativel . <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. The Specific Plan, with the measures built into <br />the Plan to protect site resources, would not have any <br />significant project impacts on biology. The Plan's <br />provisions for environmental improvements in the <br />form of restoration and creation of wetlands and re- <br />vegetation of portions of the site would result in <br />im rovements in biolo ical conditions. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />01 a, 01 b. At four intersections, under some scen- <br />arios, no feasible mitigation measures have been <br />identified that can fully reduce the impacts to a level <br />of less than significant. At these intersections, the <br />project would contribute to unmitigatable impacts <br />and, therefore, an adverse cumulative impact is <br />found. <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />183 <br />