Laserfiche WebLink
<br />sis is generally the weekday peak periods (see, for example, the comment letter from <br />the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency, whose focus is on the PM <br />peak), it is typical for transportation models not to include weekends; as a conse- <br />quence, weekend traffic counts are also lacking, <br /> <br />It is recognized that cumulative impacts may occur when major activities/events at <br />the Fairgrounds coincide with events at the project site, Therefore, coordination <br />between Pleasanton and the Fairgrounds will be needed, See Response C4, <br /> <br />C 4 Comment: <br />The DEIR is silent regarding the potential for patrons of events at the Fairground to <br />park for free at the project (to avoid parking fees at the Fairgrounds) and then walk <br />across Bernal Avenue at Pleasanton Avenue or other locations along Bernal Avenue, <br /> <br />Response: <br />The parking issue raised would apply only to future parking lots along the extension <br />of Pleasanton Avenue, since no parking is permitted along Bernal Avenue and no <br />street parking would be permitted along the extension of Pleasanton Avenue, <br /> <br />The Specific Plan recognizes the need for coordination of activities between the <br />Specific Plan/Bernal Community Park site and the Fairgrounds: See Specific Plan, p, <br />31, Off-site Coordination Policy 1, Guidelines 1,1,1,2, and 1,3 regarding coordination <br />of City/Fairgrounds events, <br /> <br />The City intends to work closely with the Fairgrounds to limit the numbers of Fair- <br />grounds patrons seeking free parking at the Bernal Property, However, since the, <br />Bernal parking lots will be public, the options for limiting public parking are consid- <br />erably reduced, The posting of signs at Bernal parking lots indicating that the lots are <br />for Bernal activities will probably be necessary on occasion, <br /> <br />C 5 Comment: <br />Will signalized intersections accommodate large numbers of pedestrians who will <br />walk to the Fairgrounds from the project? <br /> <br />Response: <br />City signalized intersection phasing and striping standards require intersections to <br />safely accommodate the pertinent pedestrian volume demand, <br /> <br />C 6 Comment: <br />Has the design and location of the project's parking lots taken into consideration the <br />number of Fairgrounds patrons who will seek to park at the project site for free? <br /> <br />Response: <br />Design and siting of the Bernal parking lots have carefully taken the Fairgrounds into <br />account as well as a variety of other considerations, including: proximity to the facili- <br />ties they serve, access to the Bernal property interior street system, traffic calming <br />patterns, bus stop locations, preservation of open space lands, safety to park facility <br />users, etc, A Fairgrounds representative was appointed by the Pleasanton City <br />Council in late 2000 to both the Bernal Property Specific Plan Task Force and to the <br />Bernal Community Park Master plan Task Force to participate in the planning efforts <br />by providing input of this nature, <br /> <br />18 <br />