My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 06035
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
RES 06035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2006 4:17:08 PM
Creation date
6/7/2006 4:02:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2006
DOCUMENT NO
RES 06035
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Response: <br />The commenter suggests that implementation of the Specific Plan could increase <br />runoff from the site, potentially causing erosion in downstream waterways, This <br />phenomenon is referred to as "hydrograph modification" or "hydromodification," <br /> <br />Under section c(l) of the Hydrology and Water Quality section of the DEI R (p, 88) <br />the methodology for addressing potential hydromodification impacts is discussed, <br />Under existing regulatory requirements, the project must comply with the County- <br />wide NPDES permit and the City's storm water program that addresses hydromodi- <br />fication, <br /> <br />The City is committed to the development of a drainage plan, including a redesigned <br />conveyance channel and new detention features, that approximate (and in some ways <br />improve) the existing discharge hydrograph for the site, <br /> <br />See also Responses A6a and C18, <br /> <br />E 7 Comment: <br />Downstream storm drain facilities, including creek areas, should be evaluated for <br />adequate conveyance capacity, Off-site and/or on-site mitigation measures may be <br />necessary to accommodate the augmented runoff, <br /> <br />Response: <br />The commenter suggests that implementation of the Specific Plan could increase <br />runoff from the site, potentially causing flooding of downstream conveyances, Com- <br />pliance with the requirements of the County-wide NPDES permit with regard to <br />hydrograph modification will minimize the potential for increased peak discharges <br />from the site and exceedance of capacity of downstream conveyances, Please refer to <br />Response H1 for additional discussion of hydro modification requirements, <br /> <br />E 8 Comment: <br />The Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is an active <br />participant in the efforts to reintroduce steel head trout back into the network of <br />creeks in Alameda County, including Alameda County and the Arroyo de la Laguna, <br />The success of the proposed fish passage through the affected portion of the Arroyo <br />de la Laguna is of significant interest to the District and County, <br /> <br />Response: <br />Comment acknowledged, <br /> <br />E 9 Comment: <br />Consideration should be given for a project contribution toward the restoration of the <br />rails in the County's Niles Canyon Transportation Corridor and acquisition of rolling <br />stock for an operator; i.e, wheels to operate transit between Pleasanton and Fremont, <br />and improve and use Dublin-Pleasanton corridor as a busway to Dublin/Pleasanton <br />BART to reduce traffic congestion, <br /> <br />Response: <br />Comment acknowledged, <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.