Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Generators Manual of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), (2) <br />Pleasanton experience as indicated by local traffic counts in the vicinity of similar <br />uses, (3) expected visitation levels for the particular use, and (4) the judgment of <br />consultant and staff, <br /> <br />The following comments apply to some of the uses for which trip generation rates <br />were estimated: <br />. outdoor amphitheater <br /> <br />Outdoor stadium and indoor arena rates were used as <br />guidelines for the outdoor amphitheater use, <br />Rates provided by ITE for regional, city and county parks and <br />by SAN DAG for parks in that region of the state were used <br />as guidelines in determining trip generation rates for parks, <br />Trip rates for commercial nurseries, garden centers, and <br />other such urban commercial uses were not applied; <br />instead, trip rates for these uses were estimated based on <br />rates for uses that draw visitors to agriculture-related sites <br />(such as wineries), <br /> <br />When limited data were available, conservative values were used to make sure the <br />trip generation estimates did not underestimate traffic generation from the site, <br /> <br />In order to clarifY this effort to determine the trip rates most applicable to the types of <br />uses potentially to be developed, the DEIR, Appendix F, is hereby amended as <br />follows: <br /> <br />F-6, Item #5, Project Trip Generation, first paragraph: <br /> <br />For the land uses proposed as part of the Phase II Specific Plan, trip generation <br />rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers - Trip Generation Manual <br />and the San Diego Traffic Generators Manual were used or supplemented <br />where no rate was clearly applicable, <br /> <br />. park uses <br /> <br />. community-garden <br />and related uses <br /> <br />H 3 Comment: <br />Please identifY which trip generation rates did not come from the ITE's Trip <br />Generation book and explain how they were derived, <br /> <br />Response: <br />See Response H2, <br /> <br />H 4 Comment: <br />Table F9 in the DEIR demonstrates the increase of traffic under the General Plan + <br />Project condition, Is the General Plan + Project condition the same as Cumulative + <br />Project condition? If not, please provide similar analyses for the Cumulative + Project <br />condition, <br /> <br />Response: <br />The General Plan + Project condition is the same as Cumulative + Project scenario, <br />The term Cumulative was used rather than General Plan + Project. <br /> <br />H 5 Comment: <br />Installation of a new traffic signal at Bernal Avenue @ 1-680 southbound could <br />impact both AM southbound and PM northbound off ramp queuing, Please provide <br /> <br />34 <br />