My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
071707
>
13 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2007 12:55:44 PM
Creation date
7/11/2007 11:56:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/17/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
13 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUD-65 Environmental Checklist <br />physical impacts associated with the provision of <br />new or physically altered governmental facilities, <br />need for new or physically altered governmental <br />facilities, the construction of which could cause <br />significant environmental impacts, in order to <br />maintain acceptable service ratios, response <br />times or other performance objectives for any of <br />the public services: <br />Fire protection? <br />Police protection? <br />Schools? <br />Parks? <br />Other public facilities? <br />Discussion <br />^ ^ ~ ^ <br />^ ^ ~ ^ <br />^ ^ ^ ^X <br />^ ^ ^ <br />^ ^ ^X ^ <br />a) The proposed project is expected to have a negligible increase in police, fire, and <br />paramedic services. The developer would contribute funds to the Pleasanton Unified <br />School District to offset this project's impacts to school facilities, with said funds being <br />used towards the construction and/or procurement of classrooms. Therefore, these issues <br />would be categorized as no-impact or ales-than-significant-impact. <br />14. RECREATION <br />Environmental Setting <br />The project sites will not be providing on-site park land. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed <br />project would: <br />• Result in the failure to meet City standards for the provision of parkland. <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.