Laserfiche WebLink
87 <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Scribner, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that <br /> the lighter blue color be approved but that the doors shall be <br /> painted the same color as the building. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 8b <br /> Council Priority Areas for 1993 Growth Management Allocations <br />~ This item was continued to the November 5, 1991 City Council <br />~ Meeting. <br />< <br />Z Item 8c <br /> San Francisco Water Department Property Task Force (SR 91:433) <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift, Director of Planning, stated that Staff has <br /> prepared a statement for what the task force is designed to do and <br /> hereby submits it for review. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver wanted to be sure that it is clear that this would <br /> not limit the discussion to just this particular project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver also stated that based on some phone calls he has <br /> received from interested citizens, he has reconsidered his <br /> participation in lieu of having room for an "average citizen" to be <br /> appointed to the Task Force. Interested persons would submit an <br /> application and go through the regular interview process along with <br /> the others. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner feels that two members from Council serving on <br /> the Task Force may be a bit heavy in that it would leave only three <br /> councilmembers to make any kind of recommendation to. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked Council whether this would be a Council <br /> Committee Report coming back to Council or be a Citizens Advisory <br /> Committee Report to Council. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer declared that he felt it would be neither as it <br /> will be a specific Task Force with recommendations being brought <br /> back for consideration by Council. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler voiced his concern, also, over Councilmembers being <br /> a part of this Task Force. However, it was the way it was set up <br /> so he feels it should be given a chance to see if it works. <br /> <br /> No one had any objections to the "charge statement" drawn up <br /> by Staff. <br /> <br /> 10-15-91 23 <br /> <br /> <br />