My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN101591
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
CCMIN101591
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2011 11:56:15 AM
Creation date
10/29/1999 10:26:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
88 <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Mr. Butler, that <br /> Resolution No. 91-179 be adopted, establishing a charge statement <br /> for the San Francisco Specific Plan Task Force, including the <br /> addition of a "Citizen-at-Large". <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 8d <br /> Alameda County Congestion Manaqement Aqency Votinq Rights <br /> (SR 91: 443) <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer presented Council with the options regarding the <br /> voting rights for the members of the Alameda County Congestion <br /> Management Agency. Option "E" is based on one vote per 100,000 <br /> increment of population and also one for 50,000 increment <br /> population. There is a third option for one vote for 75,000 <br /> increment of population. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that the <br /> voting rights stay at one vote per 100,000; should it become <br /> necessary, to support the option for one vote for 75,000, but <br /> oppose the one vote for 50,000. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 8e <br /> Development Conditions Enforcement <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner inquired if there was a better way of making sure <br /> developers complied with conditions of approval. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver also questioned whether Staff had a clear idea of <br /> who should follow up certain conditions. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta responded that in the case of Golden Eagle, the <br /> situation could not have been remedied by anything done by Staff. <br /> She further stated a number of improvements had been made in the <br /> last couple of years, including a new computer system. Further <br /> refinements are in the process which will be brought to Council at <br /> a later date. <br /> <br /> 10-15-91 24 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.