Laserfiche WebLink
91 <br /> <br /> Mr. Davis responded that he had no specific plans at the <br /> moment. It's a narrow parcel and it would be very restrictive to <br /> do anything on that property. Right now it's an asset. Without a <br /> definite plan for Foothill Road that requires this property he sees <br /> no reason for the Council to act at this time to accept the <br /> dedication. What he intended to do was to put a fence up to define <br /> the boundaries and to protect his liability. There is a slope on <br /> portions of the lot and feels that if he doesn't have some kind of <br /> barrier up that he could be held liable for some damages there. In <br /> 1982 when the subdivision was approved, the City Council <br /> specifically denied the offers of dedication. From that time to <br /> now nothing has changed in the alignment of the roadway. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush responded that it is necessary to get zoning <br /> approval to put up a fence. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer suggested that Mr. Davis get together with Staff to <br />go over the fence issue and liability question. <br /> <br /> Mr. Davis feels he has acted in good faith. When he received <br />the "stop notice" he complied and left the job site. He has no <br />problem with continuing this item until the next council meeting as <br />long as he gets the information from Staff in regards to the <br />matter. <br /> <br />12b (Moved from 4h on Consent Calendar) <br />Approve the a~reement with Luhdorff and Scalmanini, Consulting <br />Engineers for Engineering and Inspections Services on the new Joint <br />City of Pleasanton/Dublin San Ramon Services District Water <br />Production Well. (SR 91:439) <br /> <br /> Mr. Elliott responded to Mr. Cordtz's first question by <br />indicating the Scope of Work was attached to the Request for <br />Proposal and will be added to the contract. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer commented that what Staff presented in the staff <br />report was adequate. He puts his confidence in Staff's <br />recommendations which have generally been beyond reproach. He <br />recommends that, in the future, Mr. Cordtz get his information from <br />Staff prior to the City Council meetings. Staff is the proper <br />source for getting the details he is requesting. <br /> <br /> Mr. Elliott then responded to the question regarding the award <br />of construction studies. He firmly believes that there have been <br />all the necessary talks and negotiations with Dublin and Zone 7 and <br />that we are prepared to proceed at this juncture. <br /> <br /> In regards to how this well will effect the annual pumping <br />capabilities, Mr. Elliott responded that during the drought Zone 7 <br />suspended the independent quota. If that situation were to repeat <br />itself, Zone 7 would do so again. Zone 7 had encouraged the City <br />to pump as much as possible as Zone 7 could not supply what was needed. <br /> <br />10-15-91 27 <br /> <br /> <br />