My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN110601
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCMIN110601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:34 AM
Creation date
12/21/2001 11:16:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/6/2001
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN110601
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Swift said there is a basic local traffic fee that all development in Pleasanton pays <br />and an additional condition of approval that potentially can require particular developments to do <br />certain improvements. The condition added on the approval of the additional 202,000 square <br />feet was that it participate in its pro rata share of either the West Las Positas interchange or <br />whatever other mitigation is imposed. That pro rata share has yet to be determined. That would <br />be based on the 202,000 square foot expansion only. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico asked for an explanation of the concept that the shopping center actually has <br />traffic flows at different times than normal business traffic and that acts as a mitigation for some <br />of the additional expansion. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said there are two peak periods for traffic, which include the morning commute <br />traffic and afternoon return traffic. Since the mall does not open until 10:00 a.m. there is no <br />impact on local street traffic. In the afternoon, the mall does generate trips. The trips are not <br />from employees as they would be for an office use. Mall traffic studies show that as a retail <br />shopping center gets larger, the trips per square foot are actually reduced because people shop in <br />more stores in one place as opposed to making more trips. In addition, traffic leaving a mall in <br />the p.m. is more spaced out than would be the case when employees leave a business at quitting <br />time. There will be new p.m. peak hour trips for the additional square footage, but the rate of <br />increase is much lower than what it would be for an office establishment. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> Peter DeGalan, 200 E. Long Lake Road, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, representing the <br />Taubman Company, indicated he was available to answer any questions. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said that the Stoneridge Regional Mall has been more of an asset to this <br />community than anyone ever envisioned. The sales tax it generates and the partnership in the <br />community have been wonderful. This approval would allow the mall to expand as needed and <br />to continue to serve the community, so it will continue to benefit the community. <br /> <br /> Michael Kaudsen, 6370 Stoneridge Mall Road, asked where the expansion of the mall <br />would be located. He referred to the additional businesses that are located around the mall such <br />as the Charles Schwab Corporation. That will mean extra traffic. In addition, he understood that <br />there will be a new BART station, which will also add to traffic. He asked if there was a tenant <br />in mind for the expansion. <br /> <br /> Mr. DeGalan indicated Taubman Company talks to prospective tenants on an almost <br />daily basis. There is no specific tenant in mind and he did not know exactly where the expansion <br />would be constructed. He believed there are opportunities in one of the lower parking fields. <br />With regard to the BART station, Taubman has been in active discussions with BART and the <br />City of Pleasanton to insure that traffic and parking needs are met. The Heinz development <br />traffic, which is where Schwab may or may not move in, has been included in the City's traffic <br />studies. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 7 11/06/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.