Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Roush said he did not recall any such loans. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell supported putting utilities to the site, making sure the roads are <br />constructed, or whatever, but he was very uncomfortable loaning the District money for <br />operating costs. There are five elected representatives on the School Board who make the <br />decision to build the school and it feels like the City Council is becoming a de facto School <br />Board and is making educational policy decisions. He did not believe that was the job of the <br />City Council. Council provides the services and roads for the school. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico believed the decision to make the loan was to facilitate the General Plan of <br />the City of Pleasanton, which calls for neighborhood schools and sets limits on student <br />populations at various schools, as well other health and safety issues. There are issues of traffic <br />congestion around schools, parents who have to drive children to multiple schools in different <br />parts of town, air quality issues, etc. If one seeks a nexus on why the City should help the <br />District, it can be found. He said the City would not enter into an agreement to provide any short <br />term financing unless the School Board agreed to that. Staff is exploring options to work with <br />the District to facilitate the completion and opening of that school. This report does not specify <br />what the agreement would be or how the funding would take place. There is an existing model <br />to follow, but it is not yet known what the impacts of the State budget will be on the District. He <br />believed the staff recommendation was to address concerns about the shortfall and to see if there <br />is a way for the City to help mitigate the impacts. He did not believe there was any additional <br />liability for the City. The District has said one of the major issues about the opening of the <br />school is concern about operating shortfalls. The City has been asked to work with the Gift <br />Agreement developers to see if some of the funds could be used for operation of the schools. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell appreciated the explanation. School financing is extremely complicated <br />and it seems that if the District approached the City to seek help with funding options, he would <br />be more comfortable. However, it seems like the City is being the aggressor and forcing these <br />negotiations. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico said that is absolutely not the case. The District asked for creative ways to <br />help. The City has indicated it is willing to assist when necessary. There is no official decision <br />on that at this meeting, the direction is to ask staffto investigate possibilities and to bring back a <br />report. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Ayala, seconded by Mr. Campbell, to direct staff to continue to <br />work with the Vineyard Avenue developers to provide utilities to the Neal Elementary <br />School site by September 1, 2003 and to provide a date certain to the District when <br />construction can commence on the site. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembcrs - Ayala, Campbell, Hosterman, and Mayor Pico <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: Councilmember Brozosky <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 20 12/03/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />