My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AMADOR LAND & CATTLE REIMBURSEMENT 1989
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
LONG TERM AGREEMENT
>
A
>
AMADOR LAND & CATTLE REIMBURSEMENT 1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2007 4:39:40 PM
Creation date
10/9/2007 8:24:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DOCUMENT DATE
7/5/1989
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - NAME
AMADOR LAND & CATTLE
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - TYPE
REIMBURSEMENT AGMT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - RECORD SERIES
704-06
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DESTRUCTION DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ~. <br />~~i <br />t~~i ~tS 5 ~.- <br />}.l~- <br />feasibility, and community identity; These issues need to be <br />thoroughly axplor®d before the City can make`'a d®ci$ion regard- <br />ing its willingness to accommodate the proposed project. <br />8conor~ic"and Planning Systems will work with City staff to <br />identify and explor® these issues as the project alternatives <br />are being developed and xefined. The implications of th®sa <br />issues will be evaluated based upon interviews with department <br />heads and other City staff, supplemented `by additional research <br />including case studies of similar circumstances in other cities <br />and review of literature on service'standards and new tech- <br />nologies. <br />TASK 6: PUBLIC-FACILITIES FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY EVALLIATI~N <br />The landowner will have primary responsibility for proposing a <br />feasible plan to finance needed. public facilities. `EPS will <br />provide an independent evaluation of the ability of the project <br />to support the proposed.:captal financing plan. <br />We'wil estimate the value of land and improvements over time <br />based on the development projections and market data reviewed <br />in Task 1. We will compare thin financial base to the cost and <br />phasing of improvements to evaluate `the ability of land values` <br />to sustain the necessary cost burden to make'the alternative <br />.plans feasible. <br />TASK 7: LAND USE/PUBLIC SERVICE/FACILITIES REC01~4IENDATIONS <br />We will synthesize the analyses completed in Tasks 1 through 6, <br />to recommend land use and public service/facility mitigations <br />that will optimize City objectives, and/on to point out <br />instances in which the requirements of each plan alternative <br />are clearly in conflict with Cityobjectives.= Same of these <br />recommendations may be incorporated into the Study as alterna- <br />tives;' others may stand as independent factors to be considered <br />in th~,City~s deliberations as annexation conditions. <br />TASK 8: DRAFT REPORT <br />The analyses and recommendations of the study will be sum- <br />aiarized in a freestanding report to the City of Pleasanton. We <br />will work. with City staff. to identify the form .and content of <br />the report that would be most 'effective in assisting. the staff <br />and City .Council in its decision-making .processes.. <br />6 <br />....~ :,. ~__ ~ hfc ~yL _,. __ <br />3 .~ ~ ~*. f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.