My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
031808
>
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2008 1:56:39 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 4:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As in any other work session that comes before the Commission, we are now looking for <br />help from the Commission in determining whether or not this is an appropriate site and if <br />the architecture is appropriate. The Sarich property is Lot 27, which is on the south side <br />of Vineyard Avenue. The width is, I believe, approximately 12 or 15 feet in width, and it <br />curves up to an existing house which is vacant and which on the Specific Plan. The drive <br />more or less comes up; the star on the plan area represents the existing house, and the <br />numbers designate how many actual units are allowed by the Specific Plan to be placed <br />on this site. <br />So, the lower portion, the most northerly portion, six low-density residential sites can be <br />developed, and the existing home may be kept with another new residential sited in this <br />location. As you can see from the Corridor land use plan, this is a very conceptual plan. <br />When we look for development plans that come before the Planning Department, we look <br />at that as more of a concept or broad area. And so, one of the questions that is before the <br />Commission is to take a look at just how definitive is that actual siting on the concept <br />plan versus an actual topographic map that shows contours, because the circles and <br />asterisks and limits are not tied to a specific contouring or land form that can be seen on <br />this map. And these are, again, general guidelines that help Planning staff determine that <br />this more or less in the general area that we think it is. ~ • <br />The lower portion where the six units would be located is in this more bare area and-more <br />gently rolling; there are elevation and grade changes that are shown on the topographic ~ { <br />maps that you have in your packets. And as it goes up the hill, the existing residence~is • <br />actually very difficult to see from the roadway as it winds through the oaks. The new ~ • <br />roadway would follow this existing alignment, would require some widening for fire aril • !' <br />life safety: vehicle access, would curve along the route and more or less bend around to an ' <br />area that is not as vegetated. • - • <br />This is better represented from the proposed site map. The six lots are located on the F ~ • <br />northerly portion of the lot, and as it winds around, the siting is on the less vegetated site. <br />Behind it, there will be some grading that will be required to actually create that flat~pad, <br />which is one of the questions that Planning staff has for your consideration and direction. <br />The existing home is intended to be kept where it is; the proposed new residence is to be <br />located in the less-vegetated area. This actually rises from the existing road at a very <br />steep incline, so that if you were to make the determination that it should go more closely <br />to the boundary of this site, this will entail substantial and quite a bit of grading as well, <br />to create a pad that would be able to have this house plan layout. And so, the idea is to <br />look at this site and determine if the siting of the house as shown on the concept plan, the <br />land use designation plan, is where it needs to be, or if we should look at a broader <br />concept. <br />The other consideration is grading -one of the items that was discussed within both staff <br />reports is that grading will occur. The preliminary grading plan and the grade that are <br />shown are all preliminary. There is certainly much more work that engineering will do to <br />actually determine the amount of cut and fill on this slope, regardless of the siting of the <br />proposed residence. The staff report states that there is upwards of 40 feet of cut on this <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.